Year: 1988 (1987)
Publisher: Corgi Books
Language: English
Arguably
the most decisive parameter in anthropological research is perspective. It is
the one constant that governs the objective, the method, and the conclusions of
the ethnography and it delimits the framework for the level as well as the
vantage point of interpretation provided through the resulting narrative. Drawing
on linguistic scholarship from the 1950s and 1960s, social anthropologists differentiate
between two types of perspective: emic (the point of view of a member of the
observed community) and etic (the point of view of an outsider to the observed
community).
What is
emic and what is etic is often contested as the original idea of the terms is
for them to be mutually exclusive yet in practice, most of the time they turn
out to be contextual, circumstantial, overlapping, and interchangeable. There
is always some characteristic that the observer shares with the observed that
makes the fieldwork partly emic and always something that disconnects the observer from the group that makes the perspective etic.
One would
think that the most impervious bulwark against a purely etic perspective would
be life itself. Surely, life always unites the observer with the observed. Even
if we were to be observed by aliens from a different planet, they and we both
would share the experience of being alive.
Terry
Pratchett, of course, has a different opinion. In “Mort”, the fourth book of his
highly successful Discworld series, Death, which by most accounts is a
seven-foot-tall skeleton with a voice that sounds like “two slabs of granite
being rubbed together”, embarks on fieldwork to learn what it is like to be
human. He eats, drinks, gambles, and dances (for some reason neither war, work,
nor sex appear on his list of human behaviour) and interviews his informants
like a true field anthropologist about the expected sensations from each social
phenomenon and about the meaning of their activity. For Death, anything human
is exotic. Death’s response, as always in all caps, to Mort’s attempts to
understand him is telling.
“'My granny
says that dying is like going to sleep’, Mort added, a shade hopefully.
‘I WOULDN’T KNOW. I HAVE DONE NEITHER.’”
‘I WOULDN’T KNOW. I HAVE DONE NEITHER.’”
While Death
is preoccupied with his research, his business of uncoupling the spiritual
existence from its worldly shell in the moment of expiration is managed by his
dreadfully unqualified apprentice, Mortimer, or Mort for short. Here is the
interesting twist of the idea for this book. While Death is trying to live and
a living person is administering death, they begin to interchange. Mort
gradually begins to turn into Death, and Death shows increasing signs of life.
In his own
inimitable style, Pratchett ensures that the ineptitude of his characters both gets
them in trouble and provides the solution to their predicaments. The book is
just as hilarious and witty as can be expected. In fact, it is the Discworld
instalment that was voted the most popular of all Pratchett’s books in a 2003
BBC poll. Pratchett himself has spoken very warmly of “Mort” saying in an
interview that it was the first Discworld novel with which he was truly
pleased. The preceding books, according to him, had been a series of jokes held
together by a makeshift plot whereas in "Mort", the plot was in and of itself a
purpose.
Surprisingly,
unlike the Discworld books I had read thus far (Colour of Magic, The Light
Fantastic, Equal rights (yes, I am reading them in the order Pratchett
published them)), “Mort” does not end on the jocose tone one has learned to
expect from Pratchett. Instead, the ending is imbued with affection,
forgiveness, mutual understanding, and respect. As I pressed on through the
last pages, I realised that I was shielding myself from acknowledging the
emotions for fear of being tricked by Pratchett. I was waiting for the romantic
scenes to be overturned at any time and I was afraid that when they were, I
would feel embarrassed by allowing myself to be fooled by this well-known
prankster of a writer. But that moment never came. The ending was in a sense
elevated, and not at all parodic.
By any
standard, “Mort” is an intelligent and highly entertaining novel. My only advice
to the presumptive reader would be to familiarise themselves with the Discworld
in general and the Death character in particular before they plunge into this
story. I contend that a well-rooted love for and curiosity about Death greatly
enhances the joy of following his awkward efforts to understand humanity and
Mort’s struggle to clean up the mess he caused.