fredag 26 juni 2020

THE DIARY OF A YOUNG GIRL

Author: Anne Frank
Year: 1988 (1953, 1947)
Publisher: Hökerbergs
Language: Swedish (Translator Ella Wilcke)


”The Diary of a Young Girl” (”Het Achterhuis”) by Anne Frank is the authentic diary of an adolescent Jewish girl in the Netherlands from the time her family goes into hiding from the Nazis in 1942 until three days before the Gestapo raided their hiding place in 1944. And it is an overwhelming read.

Two weeks after I finished the book, I have still not managed to regain my composure. It rattled me to the core. It is a challenge not to think about what I have read and still, I am barely able to collect my thoughts and make sense of the experience.

Rendered unqualified to process Anne Frank’s diary intellectually, my emotional response is all the clearer. I feel horror, grief, and disbelief. I feel love, fear, and confusion. I feel anger. So much anger. But in this dense brew, one feeling towers head and shoulders above all others.

Shame.

Through every word and every page, shame followed me like a heavy load on my chest which sometimes made it hard to breathe and which still forces me to gasp for air when the memories force themselves to the front of my mind.

Shame came in several shapes and for different reasons.

At the beginning, the mere act of reading a young girl’s diary made me uncomfortable. This is, after all, a diary of a regular teenage girl living under highly irregular conditions. Anne Frank wrote about everyday things such as her favourite books and music, her friends and love interests, about which subjects in school she liked and disliked. I was reading the thoughts of a girl who made every effort to keep her diary secret to people around her (in the entry of the 21 September 1942 Anne writes expressively about how she had to physically protect her diary from the prying eyes of one of the other fugitives cooped up in the hiding place).

As she got older, her choice of topics developed. Being stuck in a confined space without access to classmates, friends, cousins, games, movies, sporting events, and concerts, Anne became introspective and resorted to writing about her crowded miniature world. She entrusted every secret, sensitive, and sometimes embarrassing detail to her beloved diary (or “Kitty” as she called it) and as a reader I was constantly reminded that I was an intruder in a supremely intelligent and impressionable young woman’s most private sphere.

I also felt shame about not having read this monumental document much earlier. In secondary school at the latest. For a person who prides himself on being reasonably informed on the Second World War, not having read Anne Frank’s diary is an unforgivable educational lacuna. History may have been made by Hitler, Churchill, and Truman, but history was suffered by Anne Frank and her family and millions of others like her. Their experiences constitute the basis of our knowledge about the era. They are the ones who lived and died in the midst of the world created for them. If one does not know their story, one knows nothing.  

Still, most of all I felt shame for mankind. For the scum who orchestrated the Holocaust, for the many who remained silent and allowed it to happen, and for the measly waste of a person who betrayed Anne Frank along with all the others in the yard house. How brutal, barbarous, simpleminded, and savage does a species have to be to make up an imaginary divide between people and use it as an excuse to unleash mayhem, torment, and misery on them for no other reason than that they can? What a bankrupt people we are, if our own satisfaction and self-worth require the oppression and agony of another? How lowly does one have to be, if one cannot stand on one’s own two legs but has to support oneself on the mutilated bodies of others?

None of Anne Frank’s despair, hope, fears, or confusion was her own choice. She was forced into hiding, forced to flee like a hunted animal from men who did not know her but judged her for her background. How can I not feel ashamed on behalf of humanity for this?

Having said that, dignity can still be restored.

On the 29th of March 1944, Anne wrote in her diary that Mr Bolkestein of the Dutch exiled government had encouraged the citizens of occupied Netherlands to preserve all written material from the war and announced that an archive of testimonies was to be created once peace was restored. Anne Frank immediately began to plan for the publication of her diary and even gave it the title “Het Achterhuise” under which it was later published in its original Dutch. Suddenly, the shame of reading her words was remedied. I realised that by reading her book, I was granting her wish. She wanted me to do it. What joy! What relief!

The second source of shame has also been addressed. Admittedly far too late, but I did end up reading the book in the end. Maybe I needed to grow into it longer than most. Maybe you would gain from reading it at a mature age, too. Be as it may, I did end up reading “The Diary of a Young Girl”, an omission had been corrected and my life became all the richer for it.

It remains to address the third source of shame for it, too, can be redeemed. The forces that time and again fling the world into chaos are rarely unopposed. But they are still frequently victorious. Their success depends less on their own strength or the weakness of the opposition and more on the silence of the masses. By remaining silent, we side with the oppressors. It is imperative that people of good will unite and take action whenever the stench of pettiness, inferiority complex, narrow-mindedness, and hatred poisons the air.

But it is not enough to detect it in others. We must all be aware that we are human, too. We are, whether we like to acknowledge it or not, specimens of the same base species that for generations has slandered, slated, and slain each other for the silliest reasons. We need to recognise and reconcile with the fact that we are different from the butchers of Amsterdam not in nature, but in our ability to allow reason to trump our instincts.

Anne Frank’s death was pointless, but I for one will do what I can to make sure that her short life was meaningful. I will not live in shame.




måndag 8 juni 2020

TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD

Author: Harper Lee
Year: 2010 (1960)
Publisher: Albert Bonniers Förlag
Language: Swedish (Translator Jadwiga P. Westrup)


99 years ago, 19-year-old Dick Rowland was shining shoes in downtown Tulsa, Oklahoma. As an African-American, the only lavatory available to him, according to the law of the land in 1921, was at the top of the nearby Drexel building. The lift was operated by 17-year-old Sarah Page; a white girl. Upon entering the lift, Dick tripped. To break his fall, he instinctively grabbed on to Sarah’s arm accidentally tearing part of her sleeve. He was promptly arrested for attempted rape. The headline in The Tulsa Tribune on the next day read ”Nab Negro for Attacking Girl in Elevator”.

This triggered the most violent assault on the black community ever perpetrated on US soil. For 16 hours during the night between the 31st of May and 1st of June, white mobs, supported by the local government, including U.S. aircraft, wreaked havoc on the black district of Tulsa. Houses were razed, fires started, bombs dropped from the air, people maimed in the street. The Tulsa Tribune reported 176 dead. Today it is known as “The Tulsa Massacre”.

I have no idea if Harper Lee knew about the Tulsa Massacre when she wrote Pulitzer Prize-winning novel “Dödssynden” (“To Kill a Mockingbird”) but growing up in the 30s and 40s in Alabama, she certainly must have had ample opportunity to study racial divide and the oppression of black people.  In many ways, the events in 1921 bear a lot of resemblance to Lee’s story. There is the segregated community, the black man wrongly accused of rape, the assumption of guilt based on skin colour, the dreadful consequences, and the ensuing feeling of shame.
    
“To Kill a Mockingbird” is a highly recommendable read. For starters, it is brimming with attractive characters, scenery, intriguing plots and subplots, and it is well written with a stable pace and solid dialogue. But that is all merely fine craftsmanship. The genius of this novel lies on a different level.
The true power of “To Kill a Mockingbird” is derived from how immersive it is. Lee is in no hurry to skip past seemingly irrelevant scenes which serve the purpose of subtly setting the scene. The reader is invited into the idyllic and carefree world of 9-year-old Scout Finch and her elder brother Jem. We learn about their hometown, Maycomb, Alabama, and about its citizens who are just as diverse and complex as people are in general. Scout and Jem like some of them more than others, as is natural, but they are all, in their own way, decent folks.

One of them is Scout’s and Jem’s father Atticus Finch; a local barrister who will soon be appointed as the accused Tom Robinson’s public defender. He is a balanced, principled, and fair man who works too much and who sometimes allows Scout and Jem more freedom than they would like.

What I find so ingenious about this angle is that in the first half of the book, with all their weaknesses and faults, most citizens of Maycomb seem likeable and, for lack of a better word; good.
Yet when the crisis hits and their characters are tested, they change. Some of those who used to smile and joke, now show up on the doorstep carrying torches and pitchforks. Others, who used to curse and cause trouble, stand up to the trouble-makers. The majority, hunker down and try to come up with excuses why not to take a stand. Those who fret about how the German Nazis treat the Jews and applaud the missionary work to help the Mruna people in Africa are unable to translate their indignation to the reality of their own neighbourhood. Scout and Jem change, too. Jem becomes angry and relentless in his judgment of his fellow Maycombians. Scout’s mind changes from that of a happy-go-lucky little girl to that of an initially confused but increasingly determined young woman.

The only person who remains unfazed by the commotion is Atticus Finch. One of the Finch-family’s neighbours, Maudie, at one point in the book says that Atticus is unique by being the same person in the courthouse as he is in the street. True to that, while fighting vehemently for the rights of his wrongly accused client, he is able to predict his defeat despite overwhelming evidence in his favour. He knows the hearts and souls of the Alabamians all too well to hope that they will put their racism aside to provide justice to an innocent black man against the word of a lying white woman. He knows, but he takes up the fight anyway. In him, Harper Lee gives us a role model. She shows us that no matter how good we think we are, we need to stay true to ourselves when the world around us crumbles and everybody else turns. Atticus Finch is the epitome of the saying “not all heroes wear a cape.” By this, Lee compels us to speak up and not remain silent, even when we are in the minority. Even if we are sure to lose the battle. It is a powerful message of moral courage.

It is imperative that we recognise, that this book is not a history lesson. Racism and bigotry are not things of the past. In the last few days, we have seen the public outcry around the western world about yet another atrocity committed against a black person in the US. Protests and violence follow. “To Kill a Mockingbird” is not about the 1930s. It is not about an era at all. It is about a mindset that transcends generations and which is still very much present in this day and age.

So... what of Dick Rowland? Since Sarah refused to press charges, he was eventually exonerated and immediately left Tulsa to settle in Kansas City. No crime had apparently been perpetrated. Still, the Tulsa Massacre happened.

On the 99th anniversary of the Tulsa massacre, the current occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington D.C. commanded the police to clear the Black Lives Matter demonstration outside his window so that he could cross the street to a nearby church to have propaganda photos taken wielding a Bible in his hand.

I pray that the 100th anniversary will be presided over by a more worthy American. Atticus Finch's work is not nearly done.