Author: Joseph Conrad
Year: 2018 (1899)
Publisher: Arcturus Publishing
Language: English
This summer,
I seem to spend an unusual amount of time in the literary wilderness. Already
having reviewed Henryk Sienkiewicz’s “In Desert and Wilderness” (see review
from June 2023) and Rudyard Kipling’s “The Jungle Book” (see review from August
2023), the time has come for me to try Joseph Conrad’s classic novella “Heart
of Darkness” on for size.
“Heart of
Darkness” is a cornerstone in modernist literature and delves into the
complexities of imperialism and the darkest alcoves of the human psyche.
Published in 1899, it remains a subject of critical analysis and debate, as it
raises profound questions about the consequences of colonialism and the conflicted
relationship of 19th century Europeans to the ethnocentric and
largely arbitrary distinction between civilization and savagery.
This story
of modest proportions, provides a blistering critique of European imperialism
and the rapacious exploitation of Africa. The novella's setting along the Congo
River serves as a microcosm for the larger imperial project, where European
powers used to extract ivory and resources with little regard for the
indigenous populations. Conrad's portrayal of the company's brutality and the
dehumanisation of Africans underlines the moral bankruptcy of imperialism. The
Congo becomes a symbol of the darkness that lurks beneath the veneer of
European civilisation. Although Africa is sometimes referred to as ‘the dark
continent’, the darkness in Conrad’s story does not come from there. It comes
from Europe.
The
character Kurtz, in particular, epitomises the corrupting influence of power on
a European mind. Initially portrayed as an idealistic and talented ivory
trader, Kurtz descends into madness and brutality in the heart of Africa. This
transformation raises questions about the perversive effect of unchecked power
and the capacity for evil embedded in European mentality.
In
simplified terms, it may appear straightforward to argue that the Nietzschean
concept of will to power manifests itself in its full glory in Conrad’s
novella. The company's exploitation of Africa and its resources, driven by a
relentless quest for profit, could be cited as examples of the inherent human
desire for control and mastery over others and over nature. Nietzsche’s ideas
of master and slave mentality also come to mind. I find it useful for the
understanding of Conrad’s critique of colonisation to dwell for a while on why
Nietzsche’s concepts of master and slave morality do not in fact apply.
Among the
key concepts of Nietzsche’s thinking is the distinction between Macht (power)
and Kraft (strength), which is not always correctly understood by his readers.
The idea of Kraft is largely associated with the ability to impose ones will
upon another by force. Macht, on the other hand, is first and foremost directed
at the individual’s ability to take control over one’s own actions, reactions,
emotions, and ultimately course of life. If that includes imposing one’s will on
others, so be it, but it is not the essential meaning of the core concept. This
also relates to the Master and slave morality dichotomy. The Master morality is
characterised by intrepidity, individualism, and nobility, whereas the slave is
characterised by conformity, submission, and humility.
Looking at
Heart of Darkness through the Nietzschean prism, one will be bound to see that
the colonisers established and maintained their domination of Africa by the use
of strength, but their actions are governed exclusively by external forces such
as greed and the pursuit of social status. Their interest for self-development,
high-mindedness, courage, and individualism is close to nil. The characters’
conformist pursuits push them to extremes and make them commit unthinkable
actions in the name of obedience and submission to social expectations. They
are, by the looks of it, driven by slave morality and unable to obtain power
without losing their minds. Conrad’s genius is thus to turn the
self-aggrandised image of colonial Europe against itself as if he were holding
up a mirror to a boastful creature thinking itself to be a prince, only for it
to see that it is in fact a frog. To Nietzsche, the will do power leads to the
rise of the Übermensch. There is no sign of an Übermensch in “Heart of
Darkness”.
Now, while “Heart
of Darkness” is a powerful critique of colonialism, it has also been criticised
itself for its racist undertones. Some argue that Conrad's portrayal of
Africans and his use of racial stereotypes reflect the prejudices of his time.
This aspect of the novella has led to ongoing debates about whether the work is
inherently racist or a condemnation of racism. My position in this ongoing
debate, which also encompasses many other works of art from times long past, is
that each writer in his or her time, uses the language that is available to
them. There is a reason Mozart did not compose jazz tunes. Conrad used the
language and the symbols available to him at the time. Even if he had been
capable to write any differently, his message may not have been intelligible to
the readers of his era. His intentions and his anti-colonial agenda could not
be clearer and I am not willing to sacrifice that on a conceptual altar that
was not erected until a century later.
Having said
that, my final note is on the writing itself. Picking up this title, I was
fully aware of Conrad’s legendary use of the English language, having read some
of his works before. I braced myself for a ride on the rapids of linguistic contortion.
I was however rather disappointed by the end result. In my view, the purpose of
advanced use of language is to increase accuracy of the communication and to
embellish or deepen the story telling. In Conrad’s case, more often than not, I
found the choice of less frequently used words in the English language
pointless. As if the writer was looking for, or even manufacturing,
opportunities to squeeze in an odd, technical, or archaic word into the text.
Some sentences seem to be there just to show off a particular vocabulary. Even
still, despite all this forced variety, the word “brooding” occurs no less than
five times in the first few pages of the book. One would think that a writer
who by all conceivable accounts seems to have swallowed a thesaurus, would have
managed to find a synonym for his favourite word.
“Heart of
Darkness” is not the only story in this volume. It is followed by a series of five
short-stories under the collective title “Tales of Unrest”.
“Karain – A
Memory” is one of Conrad’s early Malay stories and is about how a Dutchman
bulldozes into a fragile Malay society and brings dishonour to the people. It
tells about their revenge and their remorse as manifested by an imagined ghost
haunting their chieftain.
“The
Idiots” is set in Europe, more specifically in Brittany. The story describes
how a couple has one child after the other, each with a mental disorder and how
the stress that this puts on the family leads to fatal consequences.
“An Outpost
of Progress” brings the reader to West Africa. Two moderately qualified
administrators for a trading post are duped by their local foreman into
accepting outrageous terms for a transaction of ivory which ultimately leads to
a deadly rift between them.
“The
Return” is based in the City of London and circles around how an up-and-coming
gentleman’s response to his wife almost (but not actually) cheating on him
spirals out of control and about how artificial appearances clash with human
desire.
“The
Lagoon” brings Conrad back to the rivers of Malaysia and tells the story of an
indigenous man who is so blinded by love for a woman that he is capable of no
other decisions than those which will immediately guarantee his possession of
her.
Though
still composed in a language that is varied and advanced, none of these short
stories suffers from the same conspicuous linguistic preternaturalness that
encumbers “Heart of Darkness”. The title of the collection as a whole is quite
appropriate as there is a disturbance, a tension, or an element of asymmetry or
disequilibrium in each of them that is enough to incinerate the entire fabric
of reality for the characters. I particularly enjoyed “An Outpost of Progress”
which I found to capture the frailty of European self-image and our inability
to make rational decisions when required to act off-script in a foreign
environment. The savage inside of us, Conrad seems to say, is never farther
away than our next act of greed, ambition, or desire. For a species that has
the audacity to call itself ‘the thinking man’, we sure are governed a lot by
our primal instincts.
Finally, a shoutout to Peter Gray and Peter Ridley for the beautiful cover.
Inga kommentarer:
Skicka en kommentar